The performance/Looking back on the cage

 

With our performance now complete it is time for a look back and reflection on what we have learnt from this module. I think we were successful in our aim of providing an entertaining spectacle with our performance. We wanted to create something that didn’t challenge perceptions, or raise political issues. We wanted to create interesting theatre, with an emphasis on the visual. On the day our set was a lot more constricted than it had been in rehearsal, we were used to more space and this caused worry among the cast. However, fortunately, this worked in our favor as the smaller space made it easier to create the chaotic, claustrophobic atmosphere we wanted in the piece after the wild one begins to stir the cage up. We finally had access to the rostra and the levels we were on as performers created a unique and vibrant stage space, surrounded by large amounts of darkness on each side representing the unknown outside world for those caged inside. I was pleased with my performance on the day, combining my preparation of the vocal, physical and psychological attributes of my character. During the performance itself it occurred to me that the Thump would have a sense of ownership within the cage which might propel him to take other character’s items from round the cage. Strangely in the day leading up to the performance I found myself thinking heavily about Stephen King’s The Shawshank Redemption and the film which is based on it, and more specifically the experiences of Brooks Hatlen an elderly inmate of the prison who, after forty six years inside, is paroled. He responds to the news violently, out of character, attacking a friend. When released he finds the outside world scary and in fear decides it better to kill himself than live on. This thought brought me on to the issue of institutionalisation and despite being a work of fiction, influenced my eventual performance due to the links I saw between Brooks and The Thump. That fear becomes present within him, and thinking about it in this way allowed me to portray the experience better than I had before. If there was anything I could change, or do better it would be to have utilised our time better as a group as I feel we could have created an even stronger performance with more focus and dedication to the project. As a company I think we spent well, and worked together successfully as a group, in the end.

Becoming a character/Learning to fly

The casting process was short and sweet, you might say. We sat down, Lil told us which characters she wanted us to portray, and we had a read through. Afterwards Lil and Jamie declared themselves happy, and so we were cast. I was disappointed as when I had first reading the script I was worried I would be cast as the Thump, and I wanted to attempt something outside of my comfort zone. I had hoped to have a try at reading for the Twitting, but I did not get this opportunity  On reflection I have to agree with what Lil and Jamie did. Time was short, and we could not waste more of it by over prolonging the casting process. I came to find some enjoyment in playing the Thump, and though I felt being cast in this part was somewhat obvious, there is a reason that this might be so. That you simply suit the character. Also Philippa was well cast as the Twitting. I began looking at the character in a basic way, how would he move? How would he speak? And found a very early starting point, I walked with a hunch, and my steps were large but slow. I had been assigned the task of utilising the characteristics of the vulture into my performance, and I felt the character should be old, an elder of the cage. I asked that a walking stick be part of my costume very early in the process so I could begin rehearsing with it as early as possible and attempt make this prop an extension of my own physicality. The stick became my leading movement of my character, my body would follow it. The sound it creates when it hits the floor is an authoritative, brash, noise.

Having received feedback that my physicality would require more work I looked at Paul Elsam’s five variables of performance for the actors body. Tension, height, openness, space and eye contact. Or THOSE, as he refers to it. Due to the nature of the Thump as a character, he is old and prejudiced on a widespread scale, even though he doesn’t understand what this prejudice is, or why he is acting towards it in such a way. He is always in a form of conflict within himself, which I feel would create tension. Paul Elsam warns that

‘The actor in performance should use tension with care. The voice is especially susceptible to damage from tension, so try to avoid, even when playing a very tense character, centering your character’s stress in the throat or neck’ (2006, p48)

Heeding this advice I have chosen to apply tension through my hands, and the stick I carry throughout the performance. Their is already a lot of tension in my back and legs simply from the physicality I am applying to my performance, and by applying them through a more visible part of my body, such as my hands/fingers it will be more effective at showing my characters growing mental unease  Vocal tension is a risky task to undertake as you can damage your throat and voice if ill prepared. I made sure throughout the rehearsal process that my body, and most importantly, my voice was in a condition to be performed. Group warm up’s were rare in the process, but this did not bother me as I am happy to stretch and do vocal exercises on my own. Displaying tension through voice is difficult, but I feel have developed a way of speaking for the character that is both uncanny and displays his tense nature. With sharp note changes occurring in certain lines, and by varying my inflection, pace and delivery I feel that I have created a voice for the Thump that is unique and my stylistic variations will be able to present the changes in tension and stress that my character is under.

I feel it is important for me to discuss the adjustment of height in the performance,  it is an important development, and one of the major challenges and difficulties I am having within Cagebirds. Standing, and moving, with your back bent right over like mine is for the entire show is a strain on both my back and legs, and to combat this I have had to work the muscles in both areas regularly in my own time, as well as resting them sufficiently in between rehearsals. The over exaggerated style I developed eventually led to an idea of duality within the character’s psyche. That the Thump overplays his frailties, this becomes more apparent in moments of fear, and completely so at the climax of the play when the Thump kills the Wild One. Being as tall as I am manipulating my height so that I never stand completely upright until the end of the play assists in adding to the highly dramatic outcome at the end of the play. Forcing myself up slowly I then arched my back and stretched out my arms to convey a bird type mannerism of aggression before swooping forward to grab Alice by the neck. Elsam states ‘People alter their height in relation to others in social situations’  (2006, p52) In my portrayal of the Thump I use my height to adversely effect the scene around me. My character is the most powerful within the cage before the Wild One arrives, and this status qou is restored at the plays end, yet instead of displaying this power through my height I am hiding it underneath a veil of frailness.

The ambient sound we have created for our performance comes from the need of an extra texture to give a convincing insight into life within a bird cage. Before we added this layer the scenes lacked a certain energy, but now the ensemble, rather than struggling to remain focused throughout rehearsals are constantly involved. This both provides atmosphere for the piece, and stimulus for the cast.

‘To create an atmosphere, through improvised sound and movement, which has a direct and visceral effect on the principal actors: the ensemble can improvise strange and abstract moves, rhythmic or atmospheric sounds which help the actors experience aspects of the world of the play such as danger, misery, jealousy, or sensuality’ (Mosely, 2006 p98)

This ever changing atmosphere being triggered by the sounds of the actors brings a sense of an animal like response to the occurrences of the play. Such as the death of the Wild One where the noises will rise and express a wider vocal range to express panic and danger. I developed two main sounds to repeat throughout the performance. One a sound close to the noise a vulture actually makes, and another contrasting low growl like sound to display his age and aggression.

While researching vultures I discovered how they are not so much a bird of prey, but a scavenger despite their large threatening appearance. This fits with the characterisation of the Thump who only finally attacks the Wild One when given the ultimatum of kill her, or leave the cage. This violence is one of necessity, in his mind, rather than an attack of a bird of prey.

Thump

Elsam, Paul (2006) Acting characters, A&C Black publishers limited

Mosely, Nick (2006) Acting and Reacting, Nick Hern Books

The birth of Retold Theatre

Sitting in a room with 23 or so other individuals each with their own artistic morals, principles and visions and being told to choose between two varying, but vague ideas was both an intimidating and challenging way to begin this module. The room became split between political theatre, and visual theatre. Two broad ideas of which you had to choose which appealed more. To be honest neither appeals to me, and my choice came down to me simply being put off by the idea of doing Political theatre more than I was at doing visual theatre. I didn’t really know what they meant by visual, I had originally hoped it meant visual in a more basic sense. That we would create visual theatre with our bodies, and it would be a very experimental performance. But the ideas were based more in spectacle, and though not originally too excited by the proposal I came round to it, and the idea of adapting fairy tales. Fairy tales have that grand appeal to them, and the adaptability of the work is obvious. This is our groups aim, adaptation. To take the stories you know and retell them. Hence a name was born with this, Retold theatre. Having toyed with the idea of devising we had chosen to instead adapt Carol Ann Duffy’s Grimm Tales, I was against this at the time, and I voiced this opinion. I believed that the writing of these adaptations did not fit with our groups aim, to retell stories in a unique way. However a majority of the group were in favour of Grimm Tales, and considering this I stated that I would support the project despite my misgivings. I was later appointed as writer for the group, and I attempted to create a beginning and ending for the piece, a framing device for the stories to be set in. The rehearsals for Grimm Tales were a struggle with opinions on what the theatre we were creating should be differing. These differing goals led to a fracture in the tone, and a complete mess to be honest. I do not exclude myself from the debacle that became Grimm Tales, the framing device I wrote was an attempt to mirror the style of the play and ended up feeling like a piece of children’s theatre. I was disappointed with my input, and we all felt demoralised. A change was needed. So we have sat down and agreed unanimously that we want to choose a different play. We have abandoned the fairy tale idea entirely, due to frustration with the concept, and discussed what we want from our theatre company as individuals. What direction do we want to take the company in? We feel we can re adapt existing dramatic works, popular one’s, perhaps those at which people feel are cliche and revive them. Or retell them if you will. Finally it came down to two plays, Cagebirds by David Campton, or Road by Jim Cartwright. I was favorable for Road, being a keen reader of Jim Cartwright, and convinced that the play could be adapted to fit our purpose. However again the majority of the group were favorable for a different option. I was not as disheartened as I was with Carol Ann Duffy’s Grimm Tales, as I could see the positives of choosing Cagebirds, and the play fits our aspirations of creating spectacle. Creating the cage, and bringing these characters to life seems to genuinely excite us all as a group, and I feel like I have my ambition to approach the project back.

Alexander Halsall/Actor

812738_10151265371302001_517824253_o (1)

Alexander is an actor and member of Retold Theatre company, and his dramatic interests include adaptation, Shakespearean performance, Commedia dell’arte and writing for the stage.

During his time at the University of Lincoln Alexander has appeared in The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov as Firs, Hamlet by William Shakespeare as Claudius, Habeas Corpus by Alan Bennett as Canon Throbbing, Debris by Dennis Kelley as Michael, Twelfth Night, or What you will by William Shakespeare as Malvolio, in a twenty four hour durational site specific performance at the University of Lincoln Great warehouse library, and has also adapted Edgar Allan Poe’s The Raven into a solo performance. Among many other theatrical and film projects Alexander has undertook during his time at Lincoln.

Alexander has also received a qualification in hand to hand stage combat, and sword fighting for the stage.